Smart Cemetery v. Bell Holdings, L.L.C.
Missouri Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
ALMON H. MAUS, Senior Judge.
By its petition in this action, the plaintiff, Smart Cemetery, sought to quiet title and recover damages against defendants Stanley Bell and Bell Holdings, L.L.C., his development company. No one has raised an issue as to the capacity of Smart Cemetery to sue. See Rule 55.13.
The basic issue in this case is whether or not an agreement to settle a dispute which is the subject of a pending action may be enforced by a motion in that action. In this case, the trial court sustained the defendants’ motion to enforce a settlement agreement and dismissed the action. Smart…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Norden v. FriedmanSupreme Court of Missouri · 1988
- Brizendine v. ConradSupreme Court of Missouri · 2002
- Byrd v. LiesmanMissouri Court of Appeals · 1992
- Vulgamott v. PerryMissouri Court of Appeals · 2004
- McKean v. St. Louis CountyMissouri Court of Appeals · 1998
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Muilenburg, Inc. v. Cherokee Rose Design & Build, L.L.C.Missouri Court of Appeals · 2008
- Ferguson v. GiffinDistrict Court, E.D. Missouri · 2022