Legal Opinion

Brizendine v. Conrad

Supreme Court of Missouri

Decided April 9, 2002No. SC 83719PublishedCited by 40 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

LAURA DENVIR STITH, Judge.

David Brizendine brought suit for treble damages under Missouri’s anti-waste statute, section 537.420, RSMo 2000, against Nora Lee Conrad, his former tenant under a written lease-purchase agreement (“Agreement”). Ms. Conrad appeals the trial court’s $33,760.35 judgment in favor of Mr. Brizendine, alleging that a $15,000 liquidated damages clause in the Agreement was his only remedy and that it waived Mr. Brizendine’s right to sue for waste under the statute.

This Court affirms the judgment for Mr. Brizendine. Section 537.420 provides for treble damages for waste…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Murphy v. CarronSupreme Court of Missouri · 1976
  2. State Ex Rel. Nixon v. American Tobacco Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 2000
  3. Business Men's Assurance Co. of America v. GrahamSupreme Court of Missouri · 1999
  4. Edmonds v. StrattonMissouri Court of Appeals · 1970
  5. J.A.D. v. F.J.D.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1998

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by40 opinions

  1. State v. NashSupreme Court of Missouri · 2011
  2. State v. AbelnMissouri Court of Appeals · 2004
  3. Norman v. WrightSupreme Court of Missouri · 2003
  4. Wagner v. Bondex International, Inc.Missouri Court of Appeals · 2012
  5. Committee for a Healthy Future, Inc. v. CarnahanSupreme Court of Missouri · 2006

35 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API