Legal Opinion

Byrd v. Liesman

Missouri Court of Appeals

Decided February 19, 1992No. 17361PublishedCited by 20 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

PREWITT, Presiding Judge.

The question is whether there was a mutual mistake as to the extent of physical injury sufficient to nullify an oral settlement of a claim arising from an automobile collision.

Following non-jury trial the trial court denied defendant’s motion to specifically enforce the settlement agreement. The judgment further found the issues on the petition in favor of plaintiff and awarded plaintiff damages of $60,000. Defendant appeals, contending the trial court erred in not enforcing the settlement agreement “because there was no mutual mistake of fact between the parties…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Sanger v. Yellow Cab Company, Inc.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1972
  2. In Re the Marriage of LaffertyMissouri Court of Appeals · 1990
  3. Clancy v. PacentiAppellate Court of Illinois · 1957
  4. Landau v. St. Louis Public Service CompanySupreme Court of Missouri · 1954
  5. Smith v. GithensMissouri Court of Appeals · 1954

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by20 opinions

  1. Chaganti & Associates, P.C. v. Thomas Nowotny Roger v. Vardeleon, in Re Chaganti & Associates, P.C.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2006
  2. B-Mall Co. v. WilliamsonMissouri Court of Appeals · 1998
  3. Paul D. Matthes v. David D. Wynkoop and Walker-Walker Family Limited PartnershipMissouri Court of Appeals · 2014
  4. Vulgamott v. PerryMissouri Court of Appeals · 2004
  5. Visiting Nurse Association, St. Louis v. Vnahealthcare, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2003

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API