Legal Opinion

Muilenburg, Inc. v. Cherokee Rose Design & Build, L.L.C.

Missouri Court of Appeals

Decided May 5, 2008No. 28505PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Don E. Burrell, Judge.

Facts

Muilenburg, Inc. (“Muilenburg”) appeals from the trial court’s granting of Cherokee Rose Design and Build, L.L.C.’s (“Cherokee Rose”) motion to enforce a settlement agreement.

Cherokee Rose acted as a general contractor and developer of the Lantern Hill subdivision in Christian County, Missouri (“Lantern Hill”). Muilenburg is a utility contractor and was hired by Cherokee Rose to install certain underground utilities within the subdivision. After the work had been performed, Muilenburg filed a petition (based on theories of breach of contract, quantum meruit, and…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Murphy v. CarronSupreme Court of Missouri · 1976
  2. Alack v. Vic Tanny International of Missouri, Inc.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1996
  3. Royal Banks of Missouri v. FridkinSupreme Court of Missouri · 1991
  4. Malan Realty Investors, Inc. v. HarrisSupreme Court of Missouri · 1997
  5. Eaton v. Mallinckrodt, Inc.Supreme Court of Missouri · 2007

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Grant v. SearsMissouri Court of Appeals · 2012
  2. Rogers v. Hester Ex Rel. MillsMissouri Court of Appeals · 2010
  3. Shaw Hofstra & Associates v. Ladco Development, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2012
  4. Thirty and 141, LP v. LOWE'S HOME CENTERS, INC.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2009
  5. Owen v. HankinsMissouri Court of Appeals · 2009

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API