Father v. South Carolina Department of Social Services
Supreme Court of South Carolina
1Opinion of the Court
Justice PLEICONES:
We granted certiorari to consider whether the Court of Appeals erred in reversing a family court order awarding petitioner (Father) $22,000 in attorney’s fees under the South Carolina Frivolous Civil Proceedings Sanction Act (the FCPSA). 1 The Father v. South Carolina Dep’t of Soc. Serv., 345 S.C. 57, 545 S.E.2d 523 (Ct.App.2001). We affirm.
FACTS
Respondent Department of Social Services (DSS) determined a child abuse complaint against Father was “indicated.” Father initiated an administrative appeal of this finding; 2 DSS responded by preparing to take the matter before the…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Cooter & Gell v. Hartmarx Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1990
- Hodges v. RaineySupreme Court of South Carolina · 2000
- Zabinski v. Bright Acres AssociatesSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2001
- Hanahan v. SimpsonSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1997
- Heath v. County of AikenSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1990
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- Russell v. Wachovia Bank, N.A.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 2006
- Holmes v. East Cooper Community Hospital, Inc.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 2014
- Ross v. Ligand Pharmaceuticals, Inc.Court of Appeals of South Carolina · 2006
- Ex Parte GregorySupreme Court of South Carolina · 2008
- In Re BeardCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 2004
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.