Legal Opinion

Father v. South Carolina Department of Social Services

Supreme Court of South Carolina

Decided March 10, 2003No. 25603PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Justice PLEICONES:

We granted certiorari to consider whether the Court of Appeals erred in reversing a family court order awarding petitioner (Father) $22,000 in attorney’s fees under the South Carolina Frivolous Civil Proceedings Sanction Act (the FCPSA). 1 The Father v. South Carolina Dep’t of Soc. Serv., 345 S.C. 57, 545 S.E.2d 523 (Ct.App.2001). We affirm.

FACTS

Respondent Department of Social Services (DSS) determined a child abuse complaint against Father was “indicated.” Father initiated an administrative appeal of this finding; 2 DSS responded by preparing to take the matter before the…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Cooter & Gell v. Hartmarx Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1990
  2. Hodges v. RaineySupreme Court of South Carolina · 2000
  3. Zabinski v. Bright Acres AssociatesSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2001
  4. Hanahan v. SimpsonSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1997
  5. Heath v. County of AikenSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1990

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Russell v. Wachovia Bank, N.A.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 2006
  2. Holmes v. East Cooper Community Hospital, Inc.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 2014
  3. Ross v. Ligand Pharmaceuticals, Inc.Court of Appeals of South Carolina · 2006
  4. Ex Parte GregorySupreme Court of South Carolina · 2008
  5. In Re BeardCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 2004

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API