Legal Opinion

Heath v. County of Aiken

Supreme Court of South Carolina

Decided August 6, 1990No. 23251PublishedCited by 31 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Harwell, Justice:

This case involves the issue of whether the trial court properly awarded respondent Carroll Heath, Sheriff of Aiken County (Sheriff Heath) attorney’s fees under S.C. Code Ann. § 15-77-300 (Supp. 1989). We affirm.

I. FACTUAL BACKGROUND

This case is before the Court after a trial on remand as or dered in our previous opinion in Heath v. County of Aiken, 295 S.C. 416, 368 S.E. (2d) 904 (1988) (Heath I). The action in Heath I was initially brought by Sheriff Heath to resolve the issue of the location and control of the Communications Division for appellant Aiken County. The…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Pierce v. UnderwoodSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
  2. Commissioner, Immigration & Naturalization Service v. JeanSupreme Court of the United States · 1990
  3. Buza v. Columbia Lumber CompanyAlaska Supreme Court · 1964
  4. Heath v. County of AikenSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1988

3Cited by31 opinions

  1. Layman v. StateSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2008
  2. McDowell v. South Carolina Department of Social ServicesSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1991
  3. Father v. South Carolina Department of Social ServicesSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2003
  4. Richland County v. KaiserCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 2002
  5. Seckinger v. Vessel, ExcaliburCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 1997

26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API