Heath v. County of Aiken
Supreme Court of South Carolina
1Opinion of the Court
Harwell, Justice:
This case involves the issue of whether the trial court properly awarded respondent Carroll Heath, Sheriff of Aiken County (Sheriff Heath) attorney’s fees under S.C. Code Ann. § 15-77-300 (Supp. 1989). We affirm.
I. FACTUAL BACKGROUND
This case is before the Court after a trial on remand as or dered in our previous opinion in Heath v. County of Aiken, 295 S.C. 416, 368 S.E. (2d) 904 (1988) (Heath I). The action in Heath I was initially brought by Sheriff Heath to resolve the issue of the location and control of the Communications Division for appellant Aiken County. The…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Pierce v. UnderwoodSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
- Commissioner, Immigration & Naturalization Service v. JeanSupreme Court of the United States · 1990
- Buza v. Columbia Lumber CompanyAlaska Supreme Court · 1964
- Heath v. County of AikenSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1988
3Cited by31 opinions
- Layman v. StateSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2008
- McDowell v. South Carolina Department of Social ServicesSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1991
- Father v. South Carolina Department of Social ServicesSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2003
- Richland County v. KaiserCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 2002
- Seckinger v. Vessel, ExcaliburCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 1997
26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.