Legal Opinion

Russell v. Wachovia Bank, N.A.

Supreme Court of South Carolina

Decided July 24, 2006No. 26190PublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Chief Justice TOAL:

The underlying litigation began when beneficiaries of an estate challenged the validity of a will and two trusts, alleging the documents were procured by undue influence. The trial court granted summary judgment in favor of the defendants. This Court affirmed as modified. Russell v. Wachovia Bank, 353 S.C. 208, 578 S.E.2d 329 (2003). After remittitur was issued, certain defendants moved for summary judgment, seeking to enforce no-contest clauses appearing in the will and revocable trust. The trial court denied summary judgment, ruling that the no-contest clauses were…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Fleming v. RoseSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2002
  2. Smithsonian Institution v. MeechSupreme Court of the United States · 1898
  3. Russell v. Wachovia Bank, N.A.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 2003
  4. Matter of Estate of SeymourNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1979
  5. Rouse v. BranchSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1912

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. Montoya v. Ahern (In re W.N. Connell & Marjorie T. Connell Living Trust, Dated May 18, 1972)Nevada Supreme Court · 2018
  2. Overland, Inc. v. NanceSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2018
  3. Southeastern Site Prep, LLC v. Atlantic Coast Builders & Contractors, LLCCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 2011
  4. Williamson v. MiddletonCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 2007
  5. Pee Dee Health Care, P.A. v. Estate of ThompsonSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2018

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API