Legal Opinion

Leggette v. J. D. McCotter, Inc.

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided November 24, 1965No. 191PublishedCited by 21 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtDeNNy, C.J.

The determinative question . on this appeal, based on the facts revealed by the record, is simply this: Is Crowder or McCotter, or both of them, together with their carriers, liable to the plaintiffs as the result of the death of Leggette?

In Weaver v. Bennett, 259 N.C. 16, 129 S.E. 2d 610, a statement from Nepstad v. Lambert (Minn.), 50 N.W. 2d 614, is quoted as follows:

“ ‘Though well established, the loaned-servant principle has proved troublesome in its application to individual fact situations. The criteria for determining when a worker becomes a loaned servant are not precise; as a…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Matter of De Noyer v. . CavanaughNew York Court of Appeals · 1917
  2. Nepstad v. LambertSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1951
  3. Mendel v. Fort Scott Hydraulic Cement Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1938
  4. Bright v. BraggSupreme Court of Kansas · 1953
  5. Famous Players Lasky Corp. v. Industrial Accident CommissionCalifornia Supreme Court · 1924

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by21 opinions

  1. Lewis v. BarnhillSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1966
  2. Harris v. MillerSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1994
  3. Altman v. SandersSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1966
  4. Gregory v. Garrett Corp.District Court, S.D. New York · 1983
  5. Brown v. Friday Services, Inc.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 1995

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API