Legal Opinion

Harris v. Champion

Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit

Decided January 26, 1994No. Nos. 93-5123, 93-5209PublishedCited by 271 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

EBEL, Circuit Judge.

These consolidated habeas appeals, which come to us after our remand in Harris v. Champion, 938 F.2d 1062 (10th Cir.1991) (Harris I), require us to revisit the problem of appellate delay in the Oklahoma criminal justice system. In Harris I, we ruled that the United States District Court for the Northern District of Oklahoma should have excused an Oklahoma prisoner’s failure to exhaust his state remedies before seeking federal habeas relief in light of extensive delay by the state public defender in filing an opening brief in the prisoner’s direct criminal appeal. 938 F.2d…

2Cases cited88 opinions

  1. Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  2. Coppedge v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
  3. Mathews v. EldridgeSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  4. Barker v. WingoSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  5. Estelle v. McGuireSupreme Court of the United States · 1991

83 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by271 opinions

  1. United States v. MorenoCourt of Appeals for the Armed Forces · 2006
  2. People v. WelchCalifornia Supreme Court · 1999
  3. Don Michael Dever v. Kansas State Penitentiary, the State of Kansas, Attorney General of KansasCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1994
  4. Steven Keith Hatch v. State of OklahomaCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1995
  5. Fontenot v. CrowCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2021

266 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API