Legal Opinion

United States v. Toy

Court of Appeals for the Armed Forces

Decided January 16, 2008No. 07-0316/NAPublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Judge BAKER

delivered the opinion of the Court.

Contrary to his pleas, Appellant was convicted by officer and enlisted members of forcible sodomy with a child between the ages of twelve and sixteen years, sodomy with a child between the ages of twelve and sixteen, three specifications of indecent acts with a child under the age of sixteen and two specifications of indecent acts with another in violation of Articles 125 and 134, Uniform Code of Military Justice (UCMJ), 10 U.S.C §§ 925, 934 (2000). All of the offenses were committed against Appellant’s stepdaughter. The adjudged sentence included…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. United Sav. Assn. of Tex. v. Timbers of Inwood Forest Associates, Ltd.Supreme Court of the United States · 1988
  2. On Lee v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1952
  3. United States v. BankerCourt of Appeals for the Armed Forces · 2004
  4. United States v. DatzCourt of Appeals for the Armed Forces · 2005
  5. United States v. BrandellUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1992

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. United States v. DeanCourt of Appeals for the Armed Forces · 2009
  2. United States v. DeanCourt of Appeals for the Armed Forces · 2009

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API