Legal Opinion

Tubner v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided October 27, 1980No. 434PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

PRICE, Judge:

The instant appeal presents this court with another opportunity 1 to decide a question of first impression 2 involving the interrelationship of the Uninsured Motorist Act 3 and the Pennsylvania No-fault Motor Vehicle Insurance Act. 4 The specific issue raised is whether a company designated as a servicing insurance company under the Pennsylvania Assigned Claims Plan of the No-fault Act (see 40 P.S. § 1009.108) is required to pay not only the basic loss benefits specified by the Act, but also uninsured motorist benefits. We hold that the legislative intent requires inclusion of…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Harleysville Mutual Casualty Co. v. BlumlingSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1968
  2. Heffner v. Allstate InsuranceSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1979
  3. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance v. WilliamsSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1978
  4. Adelman v. State Farm Mutual Automobile InsuranceSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1978
  5. Pattani v. Keystone InsuranceSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1967

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Tubner v. State Farm Mutual Automobile InsuranceSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1981
  2. Prudential Property & Casualty Insurance v. FalliganSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1984
  3. Motley v. State Farm Mutual Automobile InsuranceSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1983
  4. Bulgin v. Pennsylvania Assigned Claims Plan, Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Cumberland County1981
  5. Eads v. Port Authority, Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Alleghany County1991

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API