Tubner v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance
Superior Court of Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
PRICE, Judge:
The instant appeal presents this court with another opportunity 1 to decide a question of first impression 2 involving the interrelationship of the Uninsured Motorist Act 3 and the Pennsylvania No-fault Motor Vehicle Insurance Act. 4 The specific issue raised is whether a company designated as a servicing insurance company under the Pennsylvania Assigned Claims Plan of the No-fault Act (see 40 P.S. § 1009.108) is required to pay not only the basic loss benefits specified by the Act, but also uninsured motorist benefits. We hold that the legislative intent requires inclusion of…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Harleysville Mutual Casualty Co. v. BlumlingSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1968
- Heffner v. Allstate InsuranceSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1979
- State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance v. WilliamsSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1978
- Adelman v. State Farm Mutual Automobile InsuranceSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1978
- Pattani v. Keystone InsuranceSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1967
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Tubner v. State Farm Mutual Automobile InsuranceSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1981
- Prudential Property & Casualty Insurance v. FalliganSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1984
- Motley v. State Farm Mutual Automobile InsuranceSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1983
- Bulgin v. Pennsylvania Assigned Claims Plan, Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Cumberland County1981
- Eads v. Port Authority, Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Alleghany County1991
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.