G. H. Lindekugel & Sons, Inc. v. S. D. State Highway Commission
South Dakota Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
ANDERST, Circuit Judge.
The plaintiff contracted with the defendant on or about May 3, 1965, to construct a state highway department office and laboratory building. The building consists of two connected sections, referred to as the “A” section and “B” section. The contract provided the “B” section was to be completed by September 1, 1966, and the “A” section was to be completed by December 1, 1966. The plaintiff was subsequently given an extension of the completion date on each section. The “B” section was actually completed on January 8, 1967, or 85 days later than the extended dateline, and…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Kansas City Bridge Co. v. StateSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1933
- Griffis v. StateSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1942
- Cuka v. StateSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1963
- Griffis v. StateSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1943
- Sigwald v. StateSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1926
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by20 opinions
- Arcon Construction Co. v. South Dakota Cement PlantSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1984
- South Dakota Automobile Club, Inc. v. VolkSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1981
- Brasel v. City of PierreSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1973
- Mooney's, Inc. v. South Dakota Department of TransportationSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1992
- Thomas O'Connor & Co. v. City of MedfordMassachusetts Appeals Court · 1983
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.