Sigwald v. State
South Dakota Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtGates, P. J.
Purporting to act pursuant to the provisions of section 2109, Rev- Code 1919, plaintiff filed a complaint against the state in the office of the clerk of the Supreme -Court, and served the notice to answer or demur pursuant to section 2110. The Attorney General has demurred to the complaint, and the matter is now 'before us thereon. The complaint alleges an advertisement for -bids by the state highway commission in 1920 for the construction of 7 miles of state and federal aid highway in Union county; that separate bids were required (a) for grading and (b) for surfacing with gravel; that…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Stanton v. StateSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1894
3Cited by18 opinions
- Darnall v. StateSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1961
- Kansas City Bridge Co. v. StateSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1933
- Griffis v. StateSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1942
- Barnsdall Refining Corp. v. WelshSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1936
- Cuka v. StateSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1963
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.