Legal Opinion

Kansas City Bridge Co. v. State

South Dakota Supreme Court

Decided October 9, 1933No. File No. 6370PublishedCited by 30 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtRudolph, P. J.

This action was commenced under the provisions of section 2109, Rev. Code 1919, to recover on ten so-called “extra bills” claimed to be due the plaintiff- arising out of the construction of the Wheeler Bridge across the Missouri river. The plaintiff filed its complaint, and thereafter certain other proceedings were had; but it is agreed by counsel that at this time the matter is before this court for the purpose of determining whether the complaint states a cause of action as to all or any of the separate “extra bills,” upon- which- the complaint is based.

The complaint sets forth ten “extra…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. United States v. GleasonSupreme Court of the United States · 1900
  2. Plumley v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1913
  3. Wells Brothers Co. of NY v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1920
  4. Langley v. . RoussNew York Court of Appeals · 1906
  5. Watterson v. NashvilleTennessee Supreme Court · 1901

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by30 opinions

  1. Darnall v. StateSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1961
  2. Campbell Building Co. v. State Road CommissionUtah Supreme Court · 1937
  3. Subsurfco, Inc. v. B-Y Water DistrictSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1983
  4. Griffis v. StateSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1942
  5. Cuka v. StateSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1963

25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API