Legal Opinion
Mooney's, Inc. v. South Dakota Department of Transportation
South Dakota Supreme Court
Decided March 4, 1992No. 17397PublishedCited by 19 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
SABERS, Justice.
Contractor appeals partial summary judgment. We affirm.
FACTS
Mooney's, Inc. (Mooney’s) is a Minnesota based contractor. Mooney’s received notices soliciting bids on three asphalt resurfacing projects from the South Dakota Department of Transportation (DOT). The first was for resurfacing Highway 273 in Lyman County, the second and third were for resurfacing Route 6154 and Highway 26 in Sully County. Mooney’s received the notices three weeks prior to the time the bids were due. The notices did not include the plans and specifications of the projects, which Mooney’s then…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- United States v. SpearinSupreme Court of the United States · 1918
- Pickering v. PickeringSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1989
- Enchanted World Doll Museum v. BuskohlSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1986
- Baker v. WilburnSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1990
- North River Insurance Co. v. Golden Rule Construction, Inc.South Dakota Supreme Court · 1980
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by19 opinions
- Grand State Property, Inc. v. Woods, Fuller, Shultz, & Smith, P.C.South Dakota Supreme Court · 1996
- Bruske v. HilleSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1997
- Sundt Corp. v. State Ex Rel. South Dakota Department of TransportationSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1997
- Johnson v. LarsonSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2010
- Elrod v. General Casualty Co. of WisconsinSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1997
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.