Legal Opinion
Hale v. Citibank, N.A.
District Court, S.D. New York
Decided January 31, 2001No. 00 Civ. 2387(JSR)PublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM ORDER
RAKOFF, Judge.
Plaintiff Andrea Hale alleges that she is entitled to damages because the advertisements and promotional materials in response to which she opened a Citibank AutoSave account in 1999 failed to comply with the requirements of the Truth in Savings Act (“TISA”), 12 U.S.C. § 4301 et seq., and regulations thereunder. Further to her Complaint, she moves for (1) certification of a class consisting of all AutoSave account holders, and (2) summary judgment in her favor with respect to liability. For the following reasons, class certification is denied, but summary…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Ratner v. Chemical Bank New York Trust CompanyDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1971
- David Gambardella v. G. Fox & Co.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1983
- Alan J. White v. Arlen Realty & Development CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1976
- Jaroslawicz v. Safety Kleen Corp.District Court, N.D. Illinois · 1993
3Cited by8 opinions
- In re Libor-Based Fin. Instruments Antitrust Litig.District Court, S.D. Illinois · 2018
- Barnes v. Fleet National Bank, N.A.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2004
- Gocial v. Independence Blue CrossSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2003
- Martin Schnall, Individually and on Behalf of All Others Similarly Situated v. Amboy National BankCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2002
- Gordon v. Sonar Capital Management LLCDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2015
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.