Legal Opinion
Martin Schnall, Individually and on Behalf of All Others Similarly Situated v. Amboy National Bank
Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit
Decided January 28, 2002No. 01-1502PublishedCited by 32 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
BECKER, Chief Judge.
In this putative class action, plaintiff Martin Schnall alleges that the newspaper advertisements and account disclosures of defendant Amboy National Bank (“the Bank”) violated the Truth in Savings Act (“TISA”), 12 U.S.C. SS 4301-13, and regulations promulgated by the Federal Reserve Board pursuant to the Act. In particular, Schnall contends that the Bank failed to calculate the advertised annual percentage yield (“APY”) on its money market savings accounts according to the methods prescribed by the regulations and required by the statute. The District…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Northcross v. Memphis Board of EducationSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Bruner v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1952
- Mary S. Smith v. Don Chapman, D/B/A Don Chapman Motor SalesCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1980
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by32 opinions
- In Re Community Bank of Northern VirginiaCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2005
- Barnes v. Fleet National Bank, N.A.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2004
- Hirschbach v. NVE BANKDistrict Court, D. New Jersey · 2007
- Interbusiness Bank v. First Nat. Bank of Mifflin.District Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · 2004
- Vallies v. Sky BankCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2009
27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.