Legal Opinion

Foster v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided December 24, 2003No. 1D00-4334PublishedCited by 17 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

861 So.2d 434 (2002)

Curtis FOSTER, Appellant,

v.

STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 1D00-4334.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.

June 12, 2002.

Order Granting Clarification December 24, 2003.

Nancy A. Daniels, Public Defender; M.J. Lord, Assistant Public Defender, Tallahassee, for Appellant.

Robert A. Butterworth, Attorney General; Robert L. Martin, Assistant Attorney General, Tallahassee, for Appellee.

BENTON, J.

On direct appeal of his burglary conviction, Curtis Foster contends that Delgado v. State, 776 So.2d 233 (Fla.2000), requires reversal. Even though the Legislature has since…

Also in this document: Concurrence · Ervin; Per curiam; Concurrence · Ervin; Concurrence · Barfield.

2Cases cited60 opinions

  1. Burks v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
  2. Stromberg v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1931
  3. Yates v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
  4. Griffin v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
  5. Rogers v. TennesseeSupreme Court of the United States · 2001

55 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. Floyd v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 2003
  2. Johnson v. Florida Department of CorrectionsCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2008
  3. Fitzpatrick v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 2003
  4. Norman v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2002
  5. Miller v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2002

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API