Floyd v. State
Supreme Court of Florida
1Opinion of the Court
850 So.2d 383 (2002)
Maurice Lamar FLOYD, Appellant,
v.
STATE of Florida, Appellee.
No. SC95824.
Supreme Court of Florida.
August 22, 2002.
Order Denying Rehearing June 12, 2003.
James B. Gibson, Public Defender, and Christopher S. Quarles, Assistant Public Defender, Seventh Judicial Circuit, Daytona Beach, FL, for Appellant.
Robert A. Butterworth, Attorney General, and Judy Taylor Rush, Assistant Attorney General, Daytona Beach, FL, for Appellee.
2Per curiam
Maurice Lamar Floyd (Floyd) appeals his conviction of first-degree murder and his sentence of death. We have jurisdiction. See art. V, § 3(b)(1), Fla. Const.…
Also in this document: Concurrence · Lewis; Concurring in part, dissenting in part; Concurrence · Wells.
3Cases cited84 opinions
- Caldwell v. MississippiSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- Powers v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
- State v. DiGuilioSupreme Court of Florida · 1986
- Griffin v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
- State v. DixonSupreme Court of Florida · 1973
79 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
4Cited by63 opinions
- Simmons v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 2006
- Aguirre-Jarquin v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 2009
- Globe v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 2004
- Durousseau v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 2010
- Huggins v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 2004
58 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.