Legal Opinion
United States v. Bell
U S Air Force Court of Military Review
Decided March 30, 1992No. ACM 28482 (recon)PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT UPON RECONSIDERATION
JAMES, Judge:
This case is mainly about the troublesome consequences that can follow generosity in applying this Court’s rules. Appellant was convicted on his pleas of guilty. When his case was briefed to us, the appellate defense counsel assigned no errors but invited our attention to the appropriateness of the sentence and to the “matters raised by appellant pursuant to United States v. Grostefon, 12 M.J. 431 (C.M.A.1982).” As had become the prevailing practice by then, appellate defense counsel brought those latter “matters” to our attention by…
2Cases cited30 opinions
- United States v. GrostefonUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1982
- Weems v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1910
- Tate v. ShortSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- United States v. DuBayUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1967
- United States v. SnellingUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1982
25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- United States v. Specialist JOHN A. GUNDERMAN, JR.Army Court of Criminal Appeals · 2009
- United States v. PabonU S Air Force Court of Military Review · 1993
- United States v. JamesCourt of Appeals for the Armed Forces · 1995
- United States v. GirouxU.S. Army Court of Military Review · 1993
- United States v. FairclothUnited States Air Force Court of Criminal Appeals · 1995
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.