Legal Opinion

Cunningham v. Chamblin

Supreme Court of Arkansas

Decided February 18, 1957No. 5-1167PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Minor W. Millwee, Associate Justice.

Appellant is an illiterate Negro farm laborer who lives at Dell, Arkansas. He filed this suit against appellee, W. D. Chamblin, doing business as Chamblin Sales Company, to cancel a note and conditional sales contract as usurious and for damages allegedly resulting from the unlawful conversion of the automobile involved in the transaction.

At the trial it was agreed that the question of usury would first be determined., Appellant presented proof to the effect that he and his wife went to appellee’s place of business in Blytheville, Arkansas, on October 29,…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Hare v. General Contract Purchase Corp.Supreme Court of Arkansas · 1952
  2. Werbe v. HoltSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1950
  3. Crisco v. Murdock Acceptance Corp.Supreme Court of Arkansas · 1953
  4. Ford v. HancockSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1880
  5. Karoley v. ReidSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1954

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Sloan v. Sears, Roebuck & Co.Supreme Court of Arkansas · 1957
  2. Petersen v. Philco Finance CorporationIdaho Supreme Court · 1967
  3. Houff v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1980
  4. Oller v. AndrewsSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1961
  5. Bird v. BirdSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1973

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API