Crisco v. Murdock Acceptance Corp.
Supreme Court of Arkansas
1Opinion of the Court
Robinson, Justice.
Appellant Crisco bought an automobile on a conditional sales contract from James Hampton, d/b/a Public Auto Company. Hampton assigned the contract without recourse to Murdock Acceptance Corporation; later Crisco filed suit in the Pulaski Chancery Court to cancel the instrument on the ground that a usurious rate of interest had been charged. There was a decree in favor of Hampton and the finance company. However, Crisco was allowed a credit for an overcharge of $45. Crisco has appealed maintaining that the contract is usurious and therefore void, and the finance company has…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Hare v. General Contract Purchase Corp.Supreme Court of Arkansas · 1952
- Ford v. HancockSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1880
- Smith v. KaufmanSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1920
- Tillar v. ClevelandSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1886
- Harper v. FutrellSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1942
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by32 opinions
- Carper v. Kanawha Banking & Trust Co.West Virginia Supreme Court · 1974
- AKA v. Jefferson Hosp. Ass'n, Inc.Supreme Court of Arkansas · 2001
- Sloan v. Sears, Roebuck & Co.Supreme Court of Arkansas · 1957
- Wiles v. WilesSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1986
- Andrews v. LauenerSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1958
27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.