Legal Opinion

Crisco v. Murdock Acceptance Corp.

Supreme Court of Arkansas

Decided May 11, 1953No. 5-71PublishedCited by 32 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Robinson, Justice.

Appellant Crisco bought an automobile on a conditional sales contract from James Hampton, d/b/a Public Auto Company. Hampton assigned the contract without recourse to Murdock Acceptance Corporation; later Crisco filed suit in the Pulaski Chancery Court to cancel the instrument on the ground that a usurious rate of interest had been charged. There was a decree in favor of Hampton and the finance company. However, Crisco was allowed a credit for an overcharge of $45. Crisco has appealed maintaining that the contract is usurious and therefore void, and the finance company has…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Hare v. General Contract Purchase Corp.Supreme Court of Arkansas · 1952
  2. Ford v. HancockSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1880
  3. Smith v. KaufmanSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1920
  4. Tillar v. ClevelandSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1886
  5. Harper v. FutrellSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1942

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by32 opinions

  1. Carper v. Kanawha Banking & Trust Co.West Virginia Supreme Court · 1974
  2. AKA v. Jefferson Hosp. Ass'n, Inc.Supreme Court of Arkansas · 2001
  3. Sloan v. Sears, Roebuck & Co.Supreme Court of Arkansas · 1957
  4. Wiles v. WilesSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1986
  5. Andrews v. LauenerSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1958

27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API