Legal Opinion

State v. Saybolt

Court of Appeals of Minnesota

Decided October 30, 1990No. C5-89-2242PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

RANDALL, Judge.

Following a jury trial, appellant Daniel W. Saybolt was found guilty of attempted theft by swindle of over $35,000 in violation of Minn.Stat. §§ 609.52, subd. 2(4) (Supp. 1987), 609.52, subd. 3(1) (Supp.1987) and 609.17 (1986). He appeals from the judgment of conviction. We affirm.

FACTS

At the time of the alleged offense, appellant was an assistant vice president of Car-gill Metals with responsibility for the buying and selling of zinc concentrate on a world-wide basis. He had worked for Car-gill since 1974. Sometime during late September or early October 1987, Cargill…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. In Re WINSHIPSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
  2. State v. BiasSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1988
  3. State v. JonesSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1984
  4. State v. RuudSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1977
  5. State v. EngholmSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1980

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. People v. MoonIllinois Supreme Court · 2022
  2. Alston v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2010
  3. People v. HofflerAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2008
  4. State v. BlockCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 1992
  5. State v. FlicekCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2003

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API