Legal Opinion
State v. Engholm
Supreme Court of Minnesota
Decided March 28, 1980No. 49443, 49459PublishedCited by 48 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
SCOTT, Justice.
This is a joint appeal by two brothers, Roger and Marlin Engholm, from convictions of obstructing legal process with force or violence and simple assault. Their cases were consolidated for trial with those of three other defendants arising from the same incident: Albert Engholm, Linda Eng-holm, and Daniel Johnson. The cases were tried to a jury of the Ninth Judicial District. The jury found Roger and Marlin Engholm guilty on both counts, and acquitted the other three defendants. Roger and Marlin were each sentenced to one year in jail and fined $500, with execution of…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Terry v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
- Delaware v. ProuseSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- Bordenkircher v. HayesSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
- People v. IngleNew York Court of Appeals · 1975
- Newman v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1967
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by48 opinions
- State v. MooreSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1989
- Marben v. State, Department of Public SafetySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1980
- State v. DanielsSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1985
- State v. BiasSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1988
- Lienhard v. StateSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1988
43 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.