State v. Flicek
Court of Appeals of Minnesota
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
G. BARRY ANDERSON, Judge.
Appellant State of Minnesota challenges the district court’s dismissal of two grand-jury indictments against respondents. Appellant argues the district court applied the wrong rule of law in dismissing the indictments, that respondents improperly challenged probable cause, and that the district court erred by concluding that the evidence submitted to the grand jury was insufficient to establish probable cause for the offenses. Because we conclude that respondents correctly challenged probable cause, the district court properly applied the law, and the district…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Dynamic Air, Inc. v. BlochCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1993
- State v. SteinbuchSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1994
- State v. RuffinSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1968
- State v. LarsonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2000
- State v. MatillaSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1983
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- State v. EibensteinerCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2004
- El-Ghazzawy v. BerthiaumeDistrict Court, D. Minnesota · 2010
- In re the Welfare of C.M.A.Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 2003
- State v. PirsigCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2003
- In Re CMACourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2003
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.