People v. O'Donnell
Supreme Court of Colorado
1Per curiam
The complainant and the respondent in this lawyer discipline case submitted a thirty-two page stipulation, agreement, and conditional admission of misconduct. See C.R.C.P. 241.18. The conditional admission recommended that the respondent receive a private or public censure. An inquiry panel of the supreme court grievance committee approved the conditional admission, and recommended a public censure. We accept the conditional admission and publicly censure the respondent.
I
The respondent was admitted to the Colorado bar in 1965. The conditional admission attempts to resolve three separate…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- People v. SatherSupreme Court of Colorado · 1997
- People v. BanmanSupreme Court of Colorado · 1995
- People v. DeLoachSupreme Court of Colorado · 1997
- People v. DeRoseSupreme Court of Colorado · 1997
3Cited by2 opinions
- People v. GraySupreme Court of Colorado · 2001
- People v. DaltonSupreme Court of Colorado · 2016