Legal Opinion

People v. O'Donnell

Supreme Court of Colorado

Decided February 23, 1998No. 97SA469PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Per curiam

The complainant and the respondent in this lawyer discipline case submitted a thirty-two page stipulation, agreement, and conditional admission of misconduct. See C.R.C.P. 241.18. The conditional admission recommended that the respondent receive a private or public censure. An inquiry panel of the supreme court grievance committee approved the conditional admission, and recommended a public censure. We accept the conditional admission and publicly censure the respondent.

I

The respondent was admitted to the Colorado bar in 1965. The conditional admission attempts to resolve three separate…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. People v. SatherSupreme Court of Colorado · 1997
  2. People v. BanmanSupreme Court of Colorado · 1995
  3. People v. DeLoachSupreme Court of Colorado · 1997
  4. People v. DeRoseSupreme Court of Colorado · 1997

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. People v. GraySupreme Court of Colorado · 2001
  2. People v. DaltonSupreme Court of Colorado · 2016

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API