Legal Opinion

People v. Sather

Supreme Court of Colorado

Decided April 21, 1997No. 97SA91PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Per curiam

The assistant disciplinary counsel and the respondent entered into a stipulation, agreement, and conditional admission of misconduct. See C.R.C.P. 241.18. The conditional admission recommended discipline in the range of a public censure to a six-month suspension from the practice of law. An inquiry panel of the supreme court grievance committee approved the conditional admission with the recommendation that the respondent be publicly censured. We accept the conditional admission, but conclude that suspension for thirty days is warranted.

I

The respondent was admitted to practice law in Colorado…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. People v. KardokusSupreme Court of Colorado · 1994
  2. People v. CalvertSupreme Court of Colorado · 1996

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. In Re GreenSupreme Court of Colorado · 2000
  2. In Re WimmershoffSupreme Court of Colorado · 2000
  3. In re OlsenSupreme Court of Colorado · 2014
  4. People v. WilsonSupreme Court of Colorado · 1998
  5. People v. HeadSupreme Court of Colorado · 2013

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API