DeHerrera v. Manassa Land and Irrigation Company
Supreme Court of Colorado
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion by
Mr. Justice Hall.
This is a proceeding for change in the point of diversion of decreed water.
In the trial court the defendant in error appeared as petitioner, and here we refer to it as such. Plaintiffs in error appeared at the time and place fixed for hearing of the petition and participated in the proceedings as protestants, and we refer to them as such.
Petitioner owns Priority No. 48, Water District No. 22, whereby it is authorized to divert from the Conejos River for irrigation purposes 73.6 cubic feet of water per second of time. The decreed point of diversion, known as Manassa…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Farmers Highline Canal & Reservoir Co. v. City of GoldenSupreme Court of Colorado · 1954
- City of Colorado Springs v. YustSupreme Court of Colorado · 1952
- Means v. PrattSupreme Court of Colorado · 1958
- Hallenbeck v. Granby Ditch and Reservoir CompanySupreme Court of Colorado · 1960
- Terliamis v. CeriseSupreme Court of Colorado · 1956
3Cited by4 opinions
- May v. United StatesSupreme Court of Colorado · 1988
- City of Golden v. SimpsonSupreme Court of Colorado · 2004
- Atencio v. RICHFIELD CANAL COMPANYSupreme Court of Colorado · 1972
- Harvey v. DavisSupreme Court of Colorado · 1982