Legal Opinion

Terliamis v. Cerise

Supreme Court of Colorado

Decided March 26, 1956No. 17761PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Moore

We will hereinafter refer to plaintiff in error as peti tioner, and to defendants in error by name or as protestants.

Petitioner filed in the district court of Garfield county her application to change the point of diversion of 2.80 cubic second feet of water appropriated from Dry Creek originally adjudicated to Cerise Brothers Nos. 1 and 2 ditches under decree of the district court in and for Water District No. 38. She sought to change the point of diversion from said ditches to the headgate of the Pearson ditch about one mile upstream on Dry Creek, and contemplated use of the water on lands…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. City of Colorado Springs v. YustSupreme Court of Colorado · 1952

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. May v. United StatesSupreme Court of Colorado · 1988
  2. DeHerrera v. Manassa Land and Irrigation CompanySupreme Court of Colorado · 1963
  3. John Phillip Zannaras, J. P. Robinson, Jr., and U.S. Tungsten Corporation v. Bagdad Copper Corporation, a CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1958

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API