Shaw v. Town of Sebastopol
California Supreme Court
The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.
1Opinion of the CourtSloss, J.
The town of Sebastopol, one of the defendants herein, was incorporated as a town of the sixth class in 1902. One of its streets is Petaluma Avenue, which runs southerly from the center of the town to the corporate limits and then continues as a county road in a general southerly direction to the city of Petaluma. Prior to the incorporation of Sebas topol, Petaluma Avenue had existed as “Petaluma road” for a period of many years.
The plaintiff is the owner of a tract of land lying on the easterly line of Petaluma Avenue and extending along said avenue, within the town limits, for about eight…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- People Ex Rel. State Bd. of Harbor Comm'rs v. KerberCalifornia Supreme Court · 1908
- Cushing v. PiresCalifornia Supreme Court · 1899
- Southern Pacific Co. v. HyattCalifornia Supreme Court · 1901
- Ogburn v. ConnorCalifornia Supreme Court · 1873
- City of Visalia v. JacobCalifornia Supreme Court · 1884
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by14 opinions
- Archer v. City of Los AngelesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1941
- Belair v. Riverside County Flood Control DistrictCalifornia Supreme Court · 1988
- San Gabriel Valley Country Club v. County of Los AngelesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1920
- Sheffet v. County of Los AngelesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1970
- Akins v. State of CaliforniaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1998
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.