Legal Opinion
Hynix Semiconductor Inc. v. United States
United States Court of International Trade
Decided March 23, 2006No. Slip Op. 06-39; Court 03-00651PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
GOLDBERG, Senior Judge:
[Commerce’s remand determination sustained. Previously deferred portions of final affirmative countervailing duty determination sustained.]
In Hynix Semiconductor Inc. v. United States, 29 CIT -, 391 F.Supp.2d 1337 (2005) (“Hynix I”), familiarity with which is presumed, the Court sustained in part, remanded in part, and deferred reviewing in part the final affirmative countervailing duty determination made by the United States Department of Commerce (“Commerce”) regarding dynamic random access memory semiconductors (“DRAMS”) from the Republic of Korea (“Korea”).…
2Cases cited23 opinions
- Chevron U. S. A. Inc. v. Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Bowman Transportation, Inc. v. Arkansas-Best Freight System, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1975
- Auer v. RobbinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1997
- Burlington Truck Lines, Inc. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
- United States v. MorrisonSupreme Court of the United States · 2000
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Royal Thai Government v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 2006
- Guangdong Wireking Housewares & Hardware Co., Ltd. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 2013
- Borusan Mannesmann Boru Sanayi ve Ticaret A.S. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 2015
- Wilmar Trading Pte Ltd. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 2020
- Micron Technology, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 2007
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.