Legal Opinion

Former Employees of Invista, S.A.R.L. v. U.S. Secretary of Labor

United States Court of International Trade

Decided June 28, 2010No. Slip Op. 10-73; Court 07-00160PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

RIDGWAY, Judge:

In this action, former employees of the Chattanooga, Tennessee plant operated by Invista, S.a.r.l. (“the Workers”) contested the determinations of the U.S. Department of Labor denying their petition for certification of eligibility for trade adjustment assistance (“TAA”) and alternative trade adjustment assistance (“ATAA”). The determinations at issue included the Labor Department’s original denial of the Workers’ petition, as well as the agency’s denial of the Workers’ request for reconsideration, and the agency’s negative determination following a voluntary remand. See…

2Cases cited65 opinions

  1. Hensley v. EckerhartSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
  2. Pierce v. UnderwoodSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
  3. Commissioner, Immigration & Naturalization Service v. JeanSupreme Court of the United States · 1990
  4. Lewis Hodge, Claimant-Appellant v. Togo D. West, Jr., Secretary of Veterans AffairsCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1998
  5. Karnas v. DerwinskiUnited States Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims · 1991

60 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Former Employees of Western Digital Technologies, Inc. v. U.S. Secretary of LaborUnited States Court of International Trade · 2012
  2. Former Employees of Weather Shield Mfg., Inc. v. United States Sec'y of LaborUnited States Court of International Trade · 2013
  3. Koonwaiyou v. BlinkenDistrict Court, W.D. Washington · 2024

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API