Legal Opinion
Hasler v. United States
District Court, E.D. Michigan
Decided July 15, 1981No. Civ. A. 78-70130PublishedCited by 15 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
GILMORE, District Judge.
This is an action by Kathleen Hasler and her husband Michael Hasler to recover for injuries allegedly suffered as a result of a swine flu injection received by Mrs. Hasler. Mr. Hasler derivatively sues for loss of consortium, loss of services and the like.
On November 24, 1976, plaintiff Kathleen Hasler received a swine flu vaccination under the National Swine Flu Immunization Program at the Penrickton Center for Blind Children in Taylor, Michigan. The swine flu vaccine administered to her was manufactured, formulated, processed, and sold by Merck, Sharp and…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Davis v. Wyeth Laboratories, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1968
- Smith v. E R Squibb & Sons, IncMichigan Supreme Court · 1979
3Cited by15 opinions
- Kathleen and Michael Hasler, (82-1126), (81-1584) v. United States of America, (81-1584), (82-1126)Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1983
- Valerie Boruski v. The United States of America, Merck, Sharp and Dohme Company, and the City of Chicago, a Municipal CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1986
- Robert L. Petty v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1984
- Reeder v. HammondMichigan Court of Appeals · 1983
- Robert L. Petty v. United States of America, Robert L. Petty v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1982
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.