Legal Opinion

Valerie Boruski v. The United States of America, Merck, Sharp and Dohme Company, and the City of Chicago, a Municipal Corporation

Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit

Decided October 10, 1986No. 85-2847PublishedCited by 51 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HARLINGTON WOOD, Jr., Circuit Judge.

The district court granted summary judgment in favor of defendants on all four counts of plaintiff's complaint alleging personal injury resulting from a vaccination she received as part of a flu immunization program in which all three defendants, the United States, the City of Chicago (“the City”), and Merck, Sharp and Dohme Company (“Merck”) (the manufacturer of the vaccine), had some part. Plaintiff appeals claiming the district court ignored genuine issues of material fact and certain of plaintiff’s alleged theories.

I

Factual Background

Pursuant to section…

2Cases cited28 opinions

  1. Dalehite v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1953
  2. United States v. S.A. Empresa De Viacao Aerea Rio GrandenseSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  3. Aldinger v. HowardSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  4. Wyeth Laboratories v. ReyesSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
  5. Reyes v. Wyeth LaboratoriesCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1974

23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by51 opinions

  1. Rexnord Holdings, Inc. v. Maurice BidermannCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1994
  2. Vincent Goka v. Paul Bobbitt, Officer, Acting SergeantCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1988
  3. Bennett v. TuckerCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1987
  4. In Re World Trade Center Disaster Site LitigationCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2008
  5. Mary Carley v. Wheeled CoachCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1993

46 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API