Legal Opinion

Reeder v. Hammond

Michigan Court of Appeals

Decided March 15, 1983No. Docket 60677PublishedCited by 21 opinions

1Per curiam

This is a products liability action brought by plaintiffs Nancy and Edward Reeder on behalf of themselves and on behalf of their now five-year-old daughter Bonnie against Dr. Hammond, their physician, Pennwalt Corporation, the manufacturer of Biphetamine, and Wyeth Laboratories, the manufacturer of a birth control prescribed to Nancy Reeder. Biphetamine and birth control pills were prescribed for Nancy Reeder during the early stages of her pregnancy with Bonnie and allegedly, as a result, Bonnie was born with various birth defects, including mental retardation and blindness.

The case is before…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Rizzo v. KretschmerMichigan Supreme Court · 1973
  2. Smith v. E R Squibb & Sons, IncMichigan Supreme Court · 1979
  3. Littsey v. Board of Governors of Wayne State UniversityMichigan Court of Appeals · 1981
  4. Hasler v. United StatesDistrict Court, E.D. Michigan · 1981
  5. Formella v. Ciba-Geigy Corp.Michigan Court of Appeals · 1980

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by21 opinions

  1. Pittman v. Upjohn Co.Tennessee Supreme Court · 1994
  2. Knipe v. Smithkline BeechamDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2008
  3. Bardoni v. KimMichigan Court of Appeals · 1986
  4. Bee v. Novartis Pharmaceuticals Corp.District Court, E.D. New York · 2014
  5. In Re Certified QuestionsMichigan Supreme Court · 1984

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API