Legal Opinion
Buhler v. Marrujo
New Mexico Court of Appeals
Decided June 26, 1974No. 1250PublishedCited by 31 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
SUTIN, Judge.
Plaintiffs, as purchasers, sued defendants Marrujo, as sellers, for specific performance of a real estate contract which was in full force and effect; that plaintiffs deposit the balance of the purchase price plus interest with the court; and for punitive damages. Plaintiffs also sued defendants, The Bank of Las Vegas (Bank), and Glover and Gerdeman, its officers, for compensatory and punitive damages as escrow agents. The trial court sustained defendants’ motions to dismiss with prejudice. Plaintiffs appeal. We reverse.
A. Facts.
On June 24, 1969, plaintiffs filed a…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Martinez v. Research Park, Inc.New Mexico Supreme Court · 1965
- Citizens Nat. Bank of Roswell v. DavissonSupreme Court of the United States · 1913
- Bernstein v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1958
- Adams v. CoxNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1951
- Montgomery v. CookNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1966
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by31 opinions
- Schear v. Board of County CommissionersNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1984
- Vigil v. ArzolaNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1983
- Three Rivers Land Co., Inc. v. MaddouxNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1982
- Bottijliso v. Hutchison Fruit Co.New Mexico Court of Appeals · 1981
- Wallahan v. Black Hills Electric Coop, Inc.South Dakota Supreme Court · 1994
26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.