Legal Opinion
Town of Atrisco v. Monohan
New Mexico Supreme Court
Decided January 16, 1952No. 5392PublishedCited by 19 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
HARRIS, District Judge.
The appellant, Town of Atriseo, a corporation organized under Ch. LXXXVI of N.M.L.1891, approved February 26, 1891, and continued under Ch. 3, N.M.L. 1917 in which the earlier act was repealed by leaving the corporations in existence.
This corporation instituted this suit against the several named county officers to permanently enjoin them from collecting taxes assessed against the common lands of the Atriseo Grant and to enforce the return to the relator of one-half the taxes paid for 1949, and pleaded that a certain judgment in Cause No. 12666 in the District Court of…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- Commissioner v. SunnenSupreme Court of the United States · 1948
- Blair v. CommissionerSupreme Court of the United States · 1937
- Tait v. Western Maryland Railway Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1933
- United States v. Stone & Downer Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1927
- State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance v. DuelSupreme Court of the United States · 1945
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by19 opinions
- Miller Brewing Co. v. Indiana Department of State RevenueIndiana Supreme Court · 2009
- State v. BakerAlaska Supreme Court · 1964
- Board of County Commissioners v. City of Las VegasNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1980
- Lamonica v. BosenbergNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1964
- State v. Cotton Belt InsuranceNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1981
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.