Legal Opinion

Marston v. Rood

California Court of Appeal

Decided January 21, 1944No. Civ. No. 3252PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMarks, J.

This is an appeal from an order vacating a judgment. The judgment was rendered by consent. It was *436dated March 20, 1942, filed March 23, 1942, and entered March 24, 1942. It decreed that “pursuant to said confession of judgment and stipulation, that a TRUST be declared upon the diamonds described in the complaint, to-wit, the ten (10) and six (6) carat diamonds; that the defendant C. M. Rood be declared Trustee. ...”

On September 12, 1942, defendant filed a notice of motion to relieve him from the judgment entered and to enter a judgment in its stead, a copy of which was attached to the notice…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Stub v. HarrisonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1939
  2. Yoder v. YoderCalifornia Supreme Court · 1926
  3. Hunter v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1939
  4. People v. HodgesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1928
  5. Roseborough v. CampbellCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1941

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Brainard v. BrainardCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1946
  2. Gray v. LaufenbergerAppellate Division of the Superior Court of California · 1961

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API