Legal Opinion

Lichter v. United States

Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit

Decided March 10, 1947No. 10312PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

SIMONS, Circuit Judge.

The questions involved in this appeal relate to the coverage and the constitutional validity of the Renegotiation Act of April 28, 1942, 56 Stat. 226, 245, as amended by the Revenue Act of 1943, the Act of February 25, 1944, 58 Stat. 21, 78, 50 U.S.C.A. Appendix, § 1191. The appeal is from a summary judgment entered in favor of the government against the appellants for the recovery of excessive profits made under subcontracts on construction work done for the War Department.

The appellants reside in Cincinnati and their partnership will be referred to as Southern. In 1942…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Yakus v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1944
  2. Myers v. Bethlehem Shipbuilding Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1938
  3. Hirabayashi v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1943
  4. Welch v. HenrySupreme Court of the United States · 1938
  5. Stark v. WickardSupreme Court of the United States · 1944

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Lichter v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1948
  2. Monolith Portland Midwest Co. v. Reconstruction Finance Corp.District Court, S.D. California · 1955
  3. Howell Electric Motors Co. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1949
  4. United States v. Scandia Mfg. Co.District Court, D. New Jersey · 1952
  5. United States v. Howell Electric Motors Co.District Court, E.D. Michigan · 1948

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API