Legal Opinion

Howell Electric Motors Co. v. United States

Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit

Decided March 7, 1949No. 10736PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Per curiam

The sole question presented by this appeal is whether the second amendment of the Renegotiation Act, 57 Stat. 347, 50 U.S.C.A. Appendix § 1191, may constitutionally be given retroactive application to appellant’s war contracts upon which performance had been completed and final payment had been made during the period from April 28, 1942, to December 31, 1942. The second amendment was enacted July 1, 1943, and appellant concedes that it was intended by Congress to be retroactive in its scope. In an action brought by the United States and the board of directors of the R.F.C. to recover a…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Louisville & Nashville Railroad v. MottleySupreme Court of the United States · 1911
  2. Welch v. HenrySupreme Court of the United States · 1938
  3. Lichter v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1948
  4. United States v. HudsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1937
  5. Lichter v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1947

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Burkholder v. National Central Bank (In Re Burkholder)United States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1981
  2. Blanchard Mach. Co. v. Reconstruction Finance Corp.Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1949
  3. Eastern MacHinery Co. v. Under Secretary of WarCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1950
  4. Citronelle-Mobile Gathering, Inc. v. Gulf Oil Corp.District Court, S.D. Alabama · 1976

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API