Legal Opinion

United States v. Howell Electric Motors Co.

District Court, E.D. Michigan

Decided May 21, 1948No. 6700PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

PICARD, District Judge.

This action relates to interpretation of the Renegotiation Act and the several amendments thereto. While defendant insists it is only testing constitutionality of the retroactive provisions in the second amendment thereto, (enacted July 1, 1943) which makes it effective as of April 28, 1942, a good part of its brief is devoted to the contention that such amendment, as worded, carries no retroactive provision.

Findings of Fact

Defendant, a manufacturing corporation, sold a variety of items for use in the war effort. Approximately thirty-seven per cent of its sales (fiscal…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. United States v. American Trucking AssociationsSupreme Court of the United States · 1940
  2. Anderson v. Mt. Clemens Pottery Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1946
  3. Home Building & Loan Assn. v. BlaisdellSupreme Court of the United States · 1934
  4. Louisville & Nashville Railroad v. MottleySupreme Court of the United States · 1911
  5. Lichter v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1948

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. United States v. HopkinsDistrict Court, N.D. Ohio · 1951

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API