Legal Opinion

Monolith Portland Midwest Co. v. Reconstruction Finance Corp.

District Court, S.D. California

Decided January 20, 1955No. 11816PublishedCited by 22 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

JAMES M. CARTER, District Judge.

There is presented here the question of the application of the Contract Settlement Act of 1944, c. 358, 58 Stat. 649; 41 U.S.C.A. §§ 101-125, hereinafter called the Settlement Act, and the War Mobilization and Reconversion Act of 1944, Act Oct. 3, 1944, c. 480; 58 Stat. 785; 50 U.S.C.A.Appendix §§ 1651-1678, hereinafter called the Reconversion Act, to a War contract terminated on September 10, 1946, and the.war contractor’s claim for monetary compensation.

Plaintiff, Monolith Portland Midwest Company, hereinafter called Monolith, is a corporation organized under…

2Cases cited63 opinions

  1. Great Atlantic & Pacific Tea Co. v. Supermarket Equipment Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1951
  2. Precision Instrument Manufacturing Co. v. Automotive Maintenance MacHinery Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1945
  3. Hazel-Atlas Glass Co. v. Hartford-Empire Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1944
  4. Lynch v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1934
  5. Monongahela Navigation Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1893

58 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by22 opinions

  1. Powelton Civic Home Owners Ass'n Ex Rel. Hilburn Harbidge v. Department of Housing & Urban DevelopmentDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1968
  2. United States Steel Corp. v. United Mine WorkersCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1972
  3. First-Citizens Bank & Trust Co. v. CampCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1970
  4. Wyoming Bancorporation v. BonhamWyoming Supreme Court · 1977
  5. Advantor Capital Corp. v. YearyCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1998

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API