Legal Opinion
Lauer v. Zoning Commission
Supreme Court of Connecticut
Decided January 20, 1998No. SC 15680PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
NORCOTT, J.
The certified issue in this appeal is: “Did the Appellate Court properly conclude that the trial court’s judgment was untimely under General Statutes *487§ 51-1831),1 and that the untimeliness was not waived?”2 Lauer v. Zoning Commission, 241 Conn. 902, 903, 693 A.2d 304 (1997). The named plaintiff,3 Richard D. Lauer, took an administrative appeal from a decision by the named defendant, the zoning commission of the town of Redding (commission), granting a special permit to the defendant property owners, Luciano and Debra Angeloni. The trial court issued an order sustaining the…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- United Illuminating Co. v. City of New HavenSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1997
- State v. PayneSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1997
- State v. BurnsSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1996
- State v. RiosConnecticut Appellate Court · 1993
- Foley v. George A. Douglas & Bro., Inc.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1936
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Lauer v. Zoning CommissionSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1998
- Boris v. Garbo Lobster Co., No. 539867 (Mar. 24, 1998)Connecticut Superior Court · 1998
- Commission on H.R. v. Sullivan A., No. Cvbr9410-02569 (Jun. 8, 1998)Connecticut Superior Court · 1998
- Commission on H.R. v. Sullivan A., No. Cvbr9410-02569/02620 (Jun. 8, 1998)Connecticut Superior Court · 1998