United States v. Crider
United States Court of Military Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion of the Court
Duncan, Judge:
We granted review in this case to consider the contention of appellate defense counsel that the members of Panel # 2, United States Navy Court of Military Review, should have disqualified themselves from consideration of the appellant’s ease on the ground of personal bias and prejudice.
A short review of the facts of the case is necessary in order to place the granted issue in proper perspective.
Evidence at trial showed that on March 1,1969, a nine-member squad of Marines, with the accused a member and led by Corporal Reese, set up an ambush on a trail near a…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- United States v. Grinnell Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1966
- Berger v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1921
- United States v. HurtUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1958
- United States v. KnudsonUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1954
- United States v. HanrahanDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 1965
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- United States v. KincheloeUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1982
- United States v. NorfleetCourt of Appeals for the Armed Forces · 2000
- United States v. LeakCourt of Appeals for the Armed Forces · 2005
- United States v. LewisUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1978
- United States v. CriderUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1973
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.