Legal Opinion
United States Ex Rel. Moravetz v. Resor
District Court, D. Minnesota
Decided October 13, 1972No. 4-71 Civ. 1PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER GRANTING PETITIONER’S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT ON APPLICATION FOR WRIT OF HABEAS CORPUS
NEVILLE, District Judge.
Petitioner, a member of the Minnesota National Guard component of the Ready Reserve, has filed this habeas corpus petition to challenge his involuntary activation. Petitioner voluntarily enlisted in the Minnesota National Guard on July 10, 1965. AR 135-91 is the Army regulation which sets forth the requirements for satisfactory participation in a Ready Reserve component of the Army, such as the National Guard. It also sets forth procedures for enforcement, providing that a…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Thomas C. Smith, Appellant-Petitioner v. Stanley S. Resor, Secretary of the Army, Appellee-RespondentCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1969
- United States v. S. J. Groves & Sons Co.District Court, D. Minnesota · 1971
- United States v. LevinDistrict Court, D. Minnesota · 1971
- Thomas L. Jolicoeur v. Honorable Melvin Laird, Secretary of DefenseCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1972
3Cited by4 opinions
- Chilgren v. SchlesingerDistrict Court, D. Minnesota · 1974
- Febus Nevárez v. SchlesingerDistrict Court, D. Puerto Rico · 1977
- Kudley v. HolloDistrict Court, N.D. Ohio · 1976
- Wells v. Commander of the 3rd BattalionDistrict Court, E.D. Missouri · 1977