Legal Opinion

Kudley v. Hollo

District Court, N.D. Ohio

Decided September 28, 1976No. C76-838PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

TEMPORARY RESTRAINING ORDER AND ORDER FOR RETURN ON PETITION FOR HABEAS CORPUS

MANOS, District Judge.

On August 13, 1976 the plaintiff-petitioner, an army reservist, initiated this action against the defendants army officers challenging his orders to report for active duty on August 19, 1976. The complaint predicated jurisdiction upon 28 U.S.C. § 1331, the Fourth and Fifth Amendments to the United States Constitution and “other rights secured by the laws of the United States.” Paragraphs seven and eight of the Complaint allege:

“During the months of February 1974 thru November 1974, plaintiff…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Bivens v. Six Unknown Named Agents of Federal Bureau of NarcoticsSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
  2. Strait v. LairdSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  3. Schatten v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1969
  4. Feeny v. SmithDistrict Court, D. Utah · 1973
  5. McSweeney v. United StatesDistrict Court, N.D. Ohio · 1971

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. McMillan v. ShanleyDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 2024

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API