Legal Opinion

United States v. S. J. Groves & Sons Co.

District Court, D. Minnesota

Decided October 7, 1971No. 3-70 Civ. 9PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

NEVILLE, District Judge.

Use-plaintiff M. G. Astleford Co., Inc., a Minnesota corporation, commenced this action against defendant S. J. Groves and Sons Company, a contractor and its two sureties. The complaint alleges that Groves, pursuant to a contract with the Army Corps of Engineers entered into on or about June 30, 1965, agreed to construct a dam on the Eau Galle River near Spring Valley, Wisconsin. Certain portions of the work required by this contract were subcontracted on August 4, 1965, to use-plaintiff Astleford. Pursuant to 40 U.S.C. § 270a (the Miller Act), Groves duly furnished…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. United Mine Workers of America v. GibbsSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
  2. Poller v. Columbia Broadcasting System, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1962
  3. Hurn v. OurslerSupreme Court of the United States · 1933
  4. Erling David Larsen v. General Motors Corporation, a Delaware CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1968
  5. Pierce v. Ford Motor Co. Mahone v. Ford Motor CoCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1951

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Land O'Lakes, Inc. v. United-Buckingham Freight Lines, Inc.District Court, D. Minnesota · 1972
  2. United States Ex Rel. Moravetz v. ResorDistrict Court, D. Minnesota · 1972
  3. Williams v. United StatesDistrict Court, D. Minnesota · 1972
  4. Charmoll Fashions, Inc. v. Texora International Corp.District Court, D. Minnesota · 1973
  5. United States v. LeinDistrict Court, D. Minnesota · 1972

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API