Legal Opinion
Chilgren v. Schlesinger
District Court, D. Minnesota
Decided January 8, 1974No. 3-73-Civ-249PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER
DEVITT, Chief Judge.
This petition for writ of habeas corpus is before the Court on cross-motions for summary judgment under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 56. Petitioner alleges that he is being unlawfully detained in the custody of respondents by the denial of his application for discharge from the military service as a conscientious objector. Jurisdiction exists under 28 U.S.C. § 2241. For the reasons expressed below, the Court is of the opinion that the petition for writ of habeas corpus should be denied.
Petitioner is a commissioned officer in the Air Force Reserves.…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Estep v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1946
- Welsh v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
- Gillette v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- Clay v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- Stephen R. Packard v. Major General Andrew P. RollinsCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1970
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Keith v. Chilgren v. James R. Schlesinger, Secretary of DefenseCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1974
- Singer v. Secretary of the Air ForceDistrict Court, D. Colorado · 1974