Legal Opinion

Markey v. United States

United States Court of Federal Claims

Decided February 5, 1993No. Nos. 91-1446C, 91-1544CPublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

HORN, Judge.

These related cases are before the court on defendant’s motions to dismiss for lack of subject matter jurisdiction, pursuant to Rule 12(b)(1) of the Rules of the United States Court of Federal Claims (RCFC).1 In support of its motions, the defendant asserts that this court lacks the requisite jurisdiction to entertain plaintiffs’ claims for interest on the backpay awards ordered by the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (EEOC), pursuant to the Rehabilitation Act'. (See 29 U.S.C. § 794 (1988).) Plaintiffs, in their complaints, however, attempt to rely on the Back Pay…

2Cases cited47 opinions

  1. Conley v. GibsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
  2. Scheuer v. RhodesSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
  3. McNutt v. General Motors Acceptance Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1936
  4. United States v. TestanSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  5. United States v. SherwoodSupreme Court of the United States · 1941

42 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Reed v. RenoCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1998
  2. Taydus v. CisnerosDistrict Court, D. Massachusetts · 1995
  3. Carpenter v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 1993
  4. Semper v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2011
  5. 76 Fair empl.prac.cas. (Bna) 1711, 73 Empl. Prac. Dec. P 45,421 Velda S. Reed and Sharon L. McGuire v. Janet L. Reno, United States Attorney General Charles Stewart, Administrator, Federal Medical Center, Federal Bureau of Prisons and Kathy Hawk, Director of Bureau of PrisonsCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1998

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API