Legal Opinion
Griffis v. Cedar Hill Health Care Corp.
Supreme Court of Vermont
Decided September 19, 2008No. 2007-282PublishedCited by 16 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtBurgess, J.
¶ 1. Plaintiff Dawn Griffis, a certified nurse practitioner, appeals from the superior court’s judgment in favor of her former employer, defendant Cedar Hill Health Care Corporation (Cedar Hill). In that order, the superior court concluded that plaintiff had failed to meet her burden of proving that her termination was (1) causally related to activities protected by Vermont’s Whistleblower Act, and (2) that the other reasons given for her termination were pretextual. We affirm.
¶2. After a bench trial, the superior court made the following findings of fact. Cedar Hill is a Vermont corporation…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. GreenSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Robertson v. Mylan Laboratories, Inc.Supreme Court of Vermont · 2004
- Boulton v. CLD Consulting Engineers, Inc.Supreme Court of Vermont · 2003
- Gallipo v. City of RutlandSupreme Court of Vermont · 2005
- Quazzo v. QuazzoSupreme Court of Vermont · 1978
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by16 opinions
- In Re Eastview at Middlebury, Inc.Supreme Court of Vermont · 2010
- In re Application of Lathrop Limited Partnership I, II and IIISupreme Court of Vermont · 2015
- Karen Wynkoop v. Gerard StratthausSupreme Court of Vermont · 2016
- In re Willowell Foundation Conditional Use Certificate of Occupancy (Andrew Higbee, Jr. and Sheryl Knauth, Appellants)Supreme Court of Vermont · 2016
- Edward Tuohy v. City of AtlantaCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2015
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.